Court clerk is jailed over bribes

18 November 2011 Last updated at 13:11 GMT Munir Yakub Patel was filmed by a newspaper taking the bribe A clerk who took a bribe while working at a London court and became the first person convicted under the Bribery Act has been jailed for six years.

Munir Yakub Patel, 22, worked at Redbridge Magistrates' Court at the time of the incident in August.

Patel, of Green Lane, Dagenham, took £500 to avoid putting details of a traffic summons on a court database.

He admitted one count of bribery but the prosecution believe he earned at least £20,000 by helping 53 offenders.

Continue reading the main story

You manipulated the process in order to save offenders from the consequences of their offending - fines, penalty points and disqualification”

End Quote Judge Alistair McCreath Southwark Crown Court Patel was sentenced to three years for bribery and six years for misconduct in a public office, which he also admitted at Southwark Crown Court last month. He will serve both sentences concurrently.

Sentencing him, Judge Alistair McCreath told Patel: "It hardly needs saying that these were very serious offences.

"They involved a very substantial breach of trust. Your position as a court clerk had at its heart a duty to public confidence in it.

"A justice system in which officials are prepared to take bribes in order to allow offenders to escape the proper consequences of their offending is inherently corrupt and is one which deserves no public respect and which will attract none."

Secret filming

The judge added: "This indictment represents misconduct which lasted well over a year and involved at least 53 cases in which you manipulated the process in order to save offenders from the consequences of their offending - fines, penalty points and disqualification."

Patel was arrested after The Sun filmed him arranging the bribe to prevent a traffic penalty for speeding being entered on a legal database.

Between February 2009 and August 2011 he gave people advice about how to avoid being summoned to court over traffic penalties, the court was told.

The new Bribery Act, which came into force on 1 July, made it illegal to offer or receive bribes, and to fail to prevent bribery.

Before the new law, similar regulations dated back to 1906 but the Bribery Act also covers bribing a foreign public official and a corporate offence of failing to stop a bribe on behalf of your organisation.

View the original article here

Sri Lanka court jails ex-general

18 November 2011 Last updated at 13:51 GMT Fonseka was surrounded as he arrived at court ahead of the guilty verdict

A court in Sri Lanka has jailed former army chief Sarath Fonseka for three years for implicating the government in war crimes.

The court ruled that he lent credence to allegations the defence secretary ordered Tamil Tigers to be killed as they tried to surrender in May 2009.

Fonseka rejected the verdict, telling the court was it politically motivated.

He is already serving 30 months after a court martial last year convicted him of irregularities in army procurements.

Sarath Fonseka led Sri Lanka's military to victory against the Tamil Tigers in 2009.

But shortly afterwards he fell out with President Mahinda Rajapaksa, challenged him in a presidential election, lost and was arrested on a variety of charges.

Continue reading the main story

Jailing of the main opposition presidential candidate... cannot be accepted in a democratic country”

End Quote Sarath Fonseka On Friday the High Court in Colombo found him guilty on the charge of "spreading disaffection" - relating to a newspaper interview in which he apparently backed allegations that defence secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, the president's brother, ordered surrendering Tamil Tiger leaders to be shot in May 2009.

Fonseka says he was quoted out of context in the 13 December 2009 Sunday Leader article.

Appeal

One of the three judges on the bench dissented from the verdict. The 60-year-old former general was cleared on two other counts.

He faces two more court cases, including one of harbouring army deserters. The next court case starts in January.

Fonseka supporters protested outside the court

The BBC's Charles Haviland in Colombo says the charge on which Sarath Fonseka was convicted on Friday is the most serious he has faced so far - he could have been jailed for up to 20 years.

The sentence will begin in mid-2012, after Fonseka has finished serving his current term. His lawyer told the BBC he would appeal against the verdict.

An emotional Fonseka told the courtroom the judgement was aimed at keeping him out of politics.

"I don't accept this guilty verdict... This conviction happens under a dictatorship," he told the court, AFP news agency reports.

Fonseka was bundled swiftly out of court - as he was led out by the back entrance to be driven away, a yelling mob attacked his van. Minutes earlier he had been garlanded by supporters.

"I know about my husband, what he has done for the country, and he didn't do anything wrong. That is why they are going to fight against that decision," his wife, Anoma, said.

'War hero'

There has been some support for the former army chief in Sri Lanka, with supporters staging demonstrations during earlier hearings.

He had been regarded as a war hero by many across the country and seen as instrumental in defeating the rebels after decades of conflict.

An ardent nationalist of the Sinhalese ethnic majority, his downfall came when he fell out with his ideological soul mate, President Mahinda Rajapaksa, shortly after the end of the war over who should claim credit for the victory.

Our correspondent says this court case, dubbed the "White Flag" case, points to the danger faced by anyone in Sri Lanka who dares accuse the government of war crimes.

The government has firmly denied committing them - it has rejected persistent calls for an independent war crimes inquiry.

View the original article here